Skip to main content

String.format or String concat?

I'd suggest that it is better practice to use `String.format()`. The main reason is that `String.format()` can be more easily localised with text loaded from resource files whereas concatenation can't be localised without producing a new executable with different code for each language
If you plan on your app being localisable you should also get into the habit of specifying argument positions for your format tokens as well:
"Hello %1$s the time is %2$t"
This can then be localised and have the name and time tokens swapped without requiring a recompile of the executable to account for the different ordering. With argument positions you can also re-use the same argument without passing it into the function twice:
String.format("Hello %1$s, your name is %1$s and the time is %2$t", name, time)

Because printf-style format strings are interpreted at runtime, rather than validated by the compiler, they can contain errors that result in the wrong strings being created. This rule statically validates the correlation of printf-style format strings to their arguments when calling the format(...) methods of java.util.Formatter, java.lang.String,, MessageFormat, and classes and the printf(...) methods of or classes.

Noncompliant Code Example
String.format("First {0} and then {1}", "foo", "bar"); //Noncompliant. Looks like there is a confusion with the use of {{java.text.MessageFormat}}, parameters "foo" and "bar" will be simply ignored here
String.format("Display %3$d and then %d", 1, 2, 3); //Noncompliant; the second argument '2' is unused
String.format("Too many arguments %d and %d", 1, 2, 3); //Noncompliant; the third argument '3' is unused
String.format("First Line\n"); //Noncompliant; %n should be used in place of \n to produce the platform-specific line separator
String.format("Is myObject null ? %b", myObject); //Noncompliant; when a non-boolean argument is formatted with %b, it prints true for any nonnull value, and false for null. Even if intended, this is misleading. It's better to directly inject the boolean value (myObject == null in this case)
String.format("value is " + value); // Noncompliant
String s = String.format("string without arguments"); // Noncompliant
MessageFormat.format("Result '{0}'.", value); // Noncompliant; String contains no format specifiers. (quote are discarding format specifiers)
MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", value, value); // Noncompliant; 2nd argument is not used
MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", myObject.toString()); // Noncompliant; no need to call toString() on objects
java.util.Logger logger; 
logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}.", myObject.toString()); // Noncompliant; no need to call toString() on objects
logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result.", new Exception()); // compliant, parameter is an exception
logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result '{0}'", 14); // Noncompliant {{String contains no format specifiers.}}
org.slf4j.Logger slf4jLog; org.slf4j.Marker marker;
slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}"); slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message ", 1); // Noncompliant {{String contains no format specifiers.}}
Compliant Solution
String.format("First %s and then %s", "foo", "bar"); String.format("Display %2$d and then %d", 1, 3); String.format("Too many arguments %d %d", 1, 2); String.format("First Line%n"); String.format("Is myObject null ? %b", myObject == null); String.format("value is %d", value); String s = "string without arguments";
MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", value); MessageFormat.format("Result '{0}' = {0}", value); MessageFormat.format("Result {0}.", myObject);
java.util.Logger logger; logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}.", myObject); logger.log(java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE, "Result {0}'", 14);
org.slf4j.Logger slf4jLog; org.slf4j.Marker marker;
slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}"); slf4jLog.debug(marker, "message {}", 1);


Popular posts from this blog

Some good links -- Client side performance tips -- New exciting Framework, Must read. -- Very good resource to see various javaee projects and explore enterprise architecture and design concepts. -- Lots of interesting open source projects by eclipse -- the main project for supporting more dynamic languages to jvm. -- EcmaScript parser and -- Good place to learn patterns -- This will validate your website css and js -- An example of SHA1 collision attack.

@MappedSuperclass vs. @Inheritance

MappedSuperClass must be used to inherit properties, associations, and methods. Entity inheritance must be used when you have an entity, and several sub-entities. You can tell if you need one or the other by answering this questions: is there some other entity in the model which could have an association with the base class? If yes, then the base class is in fact an entity, and you should use entity inheritance. If no, then the base class is in fact a class that contains attributes and methods that are common to several unrelated entities, and you should use a mapped superclass. For example: You can have several kinds of messages: SMS messages, email messages, or phone messages. And a person has a list of messages. You can also have a reminder linked to a message, regardless of the kind of message. In this case, Message is clearly an entity, and entity inheritance must be used. All your domain objects could have a creation date, modification date and ID, and you could thus

Hashmap Keyset and EntrySet difference.

If you're concerned about performance when iterating through your hash map, I suggest you have a look at  LinkedHashMap . From the docs: Iteration over the collection-views of a LinkedHashMap requires time proportional to the size of the map, regardless of its capacity. Iteration over a HashMap is likely to be more expensive, requiring time proportional to its capacity. HashMap.entrySet() The source-code for this implementation is available. The implementation basically just returns a new  HashMap.EntrySet . A class which looks like this: private final class EntrySet extends AbstractSet < Map . Entry < K , V >> { public Iterator < Map . Entry < K , V >> iterator () { return newEntryIterator (); // returns a HashIterator... } // ... } and a  HashIterator  looks like private abstract class HashIterator < E > implements Iterator < E > { Entry < K , V > next ; // next entry to ret